Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Economic Updates

Why Banks Aren’t Lending:

Weak Economy, Regulatory Uncertainty

U.S. banks got hammered last week on concerns the sovereign debt crisis in Europe coupled with slow growth and a weak U.S. consumer are setting the stage for another financial crisis. U.S. banks still have some troubling legacy assets on their balance sheets but for the most part they are in much healthier shape then back in 2008, says John Garvey head of U.S. banks and capital markets at PricewaterhouseCoopers. "The banks have made pretty significant steps in the last couple of years to improve their stability in terms of their funding sources, in terms of capital."

If banks are better shape then why aren't they lending? Wasn't the point of TARP and the rest of the bailouts to ensure banks could lend and support the economy?

Despite a slight improvement in the Fed's most recent survey of senior loan officers, bank lending remains stunted for several reasons, Garvey argues, including:

1. Underwriting standards have improved.

2. Changes in consumer behavior. "People are paying down their debt, people are not taking on a lot of debt."

(These first two changes are long-term positives for U.S. fundamentals but in the near-term, "it's a cocktail for weak loan demand for the foreseeable future," he says.)

3. Larger companies are sitting on record amounts of cash don't need the money. Plus, they're not investing more because of the weak economy.

4. Banks are reluctant to lend to "marginal borrowers" in this weak economy.

5. Regulations rules have not been written yet. All this uncertainty means companies "hesitate to invest" and become "cautious," according to Garvey.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

DOW drops 500 points???


Dow Ends One Of Most Volatile Weeks in History Basically Flat — So What’s Next?

By James B. Driscoll, August 13, 2011

The past seven trading sessions have been nothing short of remarkable.

Last Thursday, after a couple of weeks of steady but relatively normal declines, the Dow suddenly tanked 500 points. Then, after a modest recovery on Friday, it fell 600 points. Then it soared 400 points. Then it plunged 500 points. Then it blasted off to another 400 point gain. And, today, after another 100+ point gain, it appears poised to end the week down, but within a couple of hundred points from where it started the week.

What gives?

Is this wild volatility the start of another massive market crash, along the lines of what happened in 2007-2009, or 2000-2002? Or was it just a "correction" -- sharp and scary, but now over and done?

No one knows, but Aaron and I think the risks are still to the downside.

The market's initial plunge was triggered by the European solvency crisis and the US debt downgrade. The shock of both has worn off, but the fundamental problems have not. Although the US economy is not definitely headed for a double-dip recession, as some pundits were asserting earlier this week, a recession certainly seems possible. And, regardless, the European situation and the US debt-and-deficit problems have no easy fix.

If the US can avoid a recession and the European crisis can be "contained" -- a scary word, given the happy theory in 2007 that the subprime collapse would be contained -- then the market may well have hit its lows for the year. If that happens, historians will likely attribute the recent plunge to investors adjusting to the country's slower growth prospects after the recent slowdown -- say, 2% a year instead of the 3%-4% economists were once expecting.

If Europe continues to blow up, however, or the US does sink back into recession, there's almost certainly more downside for the market. The crash of 2007 began just this way, and it lasted far longer and was far more pronounced than most observers expected.

So, enjoy a well-earned weekend and rest up for the week ahead. It seems unlikely to top this one in terms of pure hysteria, but it's unlikely to be boring. Hold on and hope, or call me to be sure.

Saturday, July 30, 2011

Senior Services

Medicare, Social Security Finances

Worsen In Bad Economy

By James B. Driscoll, July 29, 2011

WASHINGTON -- The bad economy is worsening the already-shaky finances of Medicare and Social Security, draining the trust funds supporting them faster than expected and intensifying the need for Congress to shore up the massive benefit programs, the government said Friday.

Both Medicare and Social Security are being hit by a double whammy: the long-anticipated wave of retiring baby boomers and weaker-than-expected tax receipts, according to the annual report by the trustees who oversee the programs.

The Medicare hospital insurance fund for seniors is now projected to run out of money in 2024, five years earlier than last year's estimate. The Social Security trust funds are projected to be drained in 2036, one year earlier than the last estimate. Once the trust funds are exhausted, both programs can only collect enough money in payroll taxes to pay partial benefits, the report said.

More immediate bad news for seniors: After they've gone two years with no cost-of-living increase in Social Security payments, the trustees project a 0.7 percent increase for next year, a raise so small that it will probably be wiped out by higher Medicare Part B premiums for most beneficiaries.

"There can no longer be any doubt or denial: Our nation's Medicare and Social Security programs are unsustainable and will run out of money sooner than expected," said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

Congress and the Obama administration are negotiating possible changes to Medicare and other benefit programs as part of a deal to increase the government's ability to borrow. The $14.3 trillion debt ceiling will be hit Monday, though Treasury officials are taking measures to put off an unprecedented default on government bonds until August, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said. Congress is putting off changes to Social Security, but Medicare, the government health insurance program for older Americans, is still on the table.

The longer Congress waits to fix the programs, the more likely it is that lawmakers will be forced to impose tax increases, deep benefit cuts, or both, to save them, the report said. By acting sooner, the trustees said Congress can impose gradual changes that reduce the impact on current beneficiaries and give future retirees time to prepare.

"The financial shortfalls confronting both Social Security and Medicare are substantial and – absent legislation to correct them – quite certain," wrote two of the trustees who oversee the

programs, Charles P. Blahous III and Robert D. Reischauer. "Elected officials will best serve the interests of the public if financial corrections are enacted at the earliest practicable time

The weak economy is hurting Medicare and Social Security because fewer people are working and paying payroll taxes that support the programs, the trustees said. Medicare is in worse shape than Social Security, in part because it is also being hit by rising health care costs.

To illustrate the challenges facing the programs, the trustees calculated the tax increases or benefit cuts that would be necessary to make both programs solvent for the next 75 years.

Fixing Social Security would require an increase in the payroll tax of 2.15 percentage points, or an immediate and permanent 14 percent cut in benefits, the report said. Fixing the Medicare hospital fund would require an increase in the payroll tax of nearly 1 percentage point, or a 17 percent cut in benefits.

If benefit cuts are designed to reduce the impact on current beneficiaries, future retirees will face even more significant changes, the report said. On the other hand, if the Medicare trust fund is allowed to be drained, the program will collect only enough payroll taxes to pay about 90 percent of benefits. If the Social Security trust funds are drained, the program will collect only enough payroll taxes to pay about 77 percent of benefits, the report said.

Nearly 55 million retirees, disabled people and children who have lost parents receive Social Security benefits, which average $1,077 monthly. More than 46 million people are covered by Medicare.

Even after the economy comes back, Medicare will still be in trouble. Part of the reason is the cost of modern high-tech medicine. And people are living longer, and having complicated procedures such as bypass surgery and hip replacements later in life.

On top of that, financial projections for Medicare rely partly on assumptions that the trustees' report say are obviously unrealistic or questionable. Those include a 1990s law that would require a 30 percent cut in payments to doctors, and is routinely waived each year by Congress.

The report also raised questions about whether Medicare cuts under Obama's health care plan would be politically sustainable over the long haul.

"It is important to note that the actual future costs for Medicare are likely to exceed those shown by the current-law projections in this report," the trustees said.

Six trustees oversee Social Security and Medicare. Besides Geithner, Blahous and Reischauer, the others are Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue.

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Home Prices: Consumer Confidence


The Day Ahead: Home Prices, Treasury Auction,

Consumer Confidence


Competing debt ceiling action plans have led to stagnation in Washington and slowly rising interest rates. There has however been little conviction in the move higher as global investors remain wary of underlying economic weakness.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield is 1.8bps higher at 3.023% while the two-year is steady with a 0.408% yield and the 30-year yield is up 1.7bps at 4.335%. The steeper yield curve and lack of trading conviction in the bond market is not helping mortgages. The Fannie Mae 4.0 MBS coupon is near its lowest level of the month, currently -2/32 at 100-10.

"Talks between Republicans and Democrats may have fallen apart last Friday, but a detailed outline of their discussions shows how close they came to a deal that would have reset the US tax system and had big implications for corporate America," said an optimistic Financial Times article Tuesday. "Whatever is done to raise the debt ceiling in the short term those months of discussions are likely to provide the framework for any ultimate deal to tackle the US fiscal deficit."

In Europe, Spanish, Greek, and Italian debt spreads are tighter after moving wider Monday.

Equities are broadly lower in Europe but the S&P 500 looks to open 3 points higher at 1,336.50 and Dow futures are up 26 points at 12,576.

Weak GDP in Britain is one reason equities are lower in Europe, as austerity measures appear to be capping growth.

"With the U.K. continuing to struggle with the situation of weak growth and above-target inflation, the first read on Q2 GDP indicated growth remained on the mild side, with the economy expanding 0.2% from the first quarter," said economists at BMO Capital Markets.

Light crude oil rose 0.53% overnight to $99.73 per barrel, while COMEX gold prices fell 0.06% to $1,611.10 per ounce.

Key Events Today:

Tuesday:

9:00 - The S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index is expected to post another gain thanks to seasonal boosts. Economists expect the index of 20 metropolitan home prices to rise 0.6% in May. That would put prices at 4.7% lower from the same level last year.

"Even though lower mortgage rates in recent months have improved homes' affordability, [the] supply and demand imbalance is a catalyst for further declines in home prices, which we see as likely to persist into 2012 at this point," said economists at Janney Capital Markets.


"The months' supply of existing homes up for sale remains even worse than in late 2010 and well worse than we had anticipated, suggesting that the price situation will continue to deteriorate well before it improves," they added. "Even the creator of the index, Robert Schiller himself, described the housing markets as 'stuck in the doldrums.'"

10:00 - Recent job reports expecting to their their toll on this month's Consumer Confidence index. The consensus view is for it to fall to 57.9, compared with 58.5 one month ago and 61.7 the month before.

"Consumers are being inundated with negative news about the economy and are faced with solutions to the debt ceiling issue that feature either tax increases, benefits reductions or both," explain economists at Citigroup.

"Little has happened in the way of good news for consumers," added forecasters at Nomura Global Economics. "Lower gas prices were quickly usurped by stock market volatility and the debt ceiling impasse. Confidence has slipped in the past few months and the early June sentiment survey showed further declines. We expect the consumer confidence measure to slide further to 55.2 in July."

10:00 - Expect New Home Sales to be roughly flat in June. The market forecast looks for an annualized pace of 320,000 home sales in June, just 1k up from last month and 6k down from April. Upside risks include strong building permit activity the last two months, offset by the recent decline in mortgage application volume.

"These sales have been in a range for the past year, slightly below the levels right after the recession," said economists at Citigroup. "However, we anticipate that sales will remain toward the high end of the range, given the uptick in housing starts and the small pickup in the housing market index, which signaled that homebuilders are seeing slightly better sales. ... Demand is still running below supply. This would be the fiftieth consecutive month of declining inventories."

Economists at BMO added: "Even the driest June in 21 years, which contributed to a near-15% surge in housing starts, is unlikely to provide a net benefit. This second consecutive monthly decline reflects the easing of job growth and consumer confidence this spring along with ongoing mortgage credit availability constraints. Furthermore, the new home segment continues to feel the pressure from the flow of foreclosed properties in the existing home segment. The only silver lining is that the new home market is relatively balanced with the months' supply not far off its historic median of 6.0 (6.2 in May)."

2:00 - Thomas Hoenig, president of the Kansas City Fed, will speak before the House Financial Services Committee's Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology. His talk is called "The Impact of Monetary Policy on the Economy: a Regional Fed Perspective on Inflation, Unemployment and QE3."

Treasury Auctions:
11:30 - 4-Week Bills ($18 billion)
11:30 - 52-Week Bills ($20 billion)
1:00 - 2-Year Notes ($35 billion).

According to BMO: The Fed will purchase $2.75 to $3.50 billion of notes in the 15-Aug-2018 to 15-May-2021 range for reinvestment purposes, at 11:00.

Until next time,

James B. Driscoll

Monday, June 27, 2011

DJIA-drops again??? | jamesbdriscoll

DJIA-drops again??? | jamesbdriscoll

DJIA Closes Below 12,000 — Again. What’s Going On? Better results come from directly observing market behavior, not reading Fed statements

Stocks extended their losses again this week. On Wednesday, June 22, the Federal Reserve Bank released its latest interest rates policy statement (no change). Afterward the Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke held a press conference, followed by a Q&A period.

The financial media paid lots of attention to what Bernanke said. Our own Steve Hochberg — editor of the Monday-Wednesday-Friday Short Term Update — had this to say about Bernanke’s press conference (excerpt):

Short Term Update for Wednesday, June 22, 2011; 5:15 PM, EDT:

“I think what the Fed is trying to say is that the economic ‘recovery’ has lost its upside momentum, but you didn’t have to wait until today to try and decipher this seemingly impenetrable Fed-speak to realize this fact. … In our May [Elliott Wave Financial Forecast], we published another ‘key economic indicator’ that we’re quite sure the Fed has never looked at: the share price performance of a major help wanted advertiser [Monster] relative to U.S. Q-o-Q GDP.

“Long before today’s Fed’s statement, the market has been signaling that economic conditions are deteriorating rapidly.

You can almost always read it first in The Elliott Wave Theorist or The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast and stay ahead of the trends that you will eventually read in the newspaper, or hear the Fed discuss. There are never absolutes when studying the human condition, only probabilities. But our experience has led us to conclude that observing actual behavior, as gauged minute by minute in the financial markets, is the far better and more successful way to forecast than reading a Fed statement.

“[Bottom Line]: With no follow-through to yesterday’s rally, stocks appear poised to fall further. …”

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Freaked out by bonds???

Freaked Out about the Debt Ceiling? Buy Bonds

June 11th, 2011

The U.S. is apparently hurtling toward a sovereign debt crisis. The debt limit is fast approaching, with no visible progress. Some Republicans have talked openly about the prospects of a brief default on U.S. government bonds. The ratings agencies, always the last to know about changes in financial conditions, are warning of a possible downgrade of America's debt rating. Washington has shown an unwillingness to compromise over anything in the past few years, except for measures that make the fiscal situation worse. And yet in the face of this, investors continue to pile into the market, pushing bond yields down. It's as if people reacted to warnings of a runaway train by going out and standing on the train tracks.

The thought that the rising prospect of a debt-limit debacle could cause government bonds to rally is counterintuitive. But, as Henry Blodget and I discuss in the accompanying video, it makes a certain amount of sense.

Lets unpack this a little.

Rule #1 of the past few years has been this. When bad things happen in the global economy — a tsunami in Japan, crisis in the Middle East, meltdown in Greece, fears of a slowdown in China — investors around the world react by selling riskier assets and flocking to the safest and most liquid asset around: U.S. government bonds. It's just the way the world's financial mind works.

This reflexive action still dominates behavior even though the next crisis could be in the safe haven of government bonds. And so even as it hurtles toward the deadline without resolution, as the tide of brinksmanship rises like the Missouri River, don't expect people to dump Treasuries and interest rates to spike.

And they're right not to unshackle themselves from government bonds. The U.S. is not going to default on its debt. Period. End of story. It will pay the interest on its bonds, and repay the principal of those that come due.

Consider the difference in mentality and behavior between private borrowers and public borrowers. As seen in the mortgage crisis and at times in the corporate world, private borrowers don't have any compunction about walking away from their biggest debts -- mortgages, bank loans or bonds. In many instances, debt payments came last. Lots of people who walked away from mortgages continued to pay their cable bill, cell phone and car payments, and to eat. At the other end of the spectrum, private equity billionaires chose not to scrounge up the cash to stay current on bank or bond debt when they realized they couldn't salvage the underlying company. They continued to pay themselves management fees, and buy homes and jets even as they shirked debt payments.  The public sector takes the opposite approach. States and cities generally put bondholders first in line ahead of other priorities. Governments have all sorts of ways to conserve cash that don't involve missing bond payments. When California ran into cash flow problems in 2009, it didn't miss bond payments. It issued IOUs to vendors and furloughed employees. On a larger scale, that's what states and cities are doing.



They're slashing funding for higher education, laying off teachers, turning out streetlights, reducing pension contributions, cutting road investments — everything but missing bond payments. That's why municipal and state defaults are so rare, and why analyst Meredith Whitney's call for scores of municipal bond defaults is way off base. Yes, there will be some. But government reliance on debt to fund of operations and investments is so great that they'd rather alienate workers and citizens and taxpayers than anger the bond market.

The same holds true for the federal government. The U.S. is collecting plenty of revenues, more than enough to make its interest payments. So far this fiscal year it has collected $1.3 trillion in revenues and paid $244 billion in interest on federal securities. If it isn't allowed to issue new debt, there are all sorts of things the government can do to ensure it has the necessary resources to stay current on bond payments. Many of them would be painful and unpopular — cutting benefits and food stamps, delaying payment terms on contracts, refraining from placing big new orders. Of course, all these moves would be contractionary — they'd help slow economic growth.

And that's the reason the failure of the debt ceiling would actually be good for bonds and bad for stocks. The U.S. government occupies a pretty large footprint in the economy. It employs 2.85 million people directly. Next, think of all the businesses, many of them publicly held, that rely on the government for a big chunk of their business. For-profit education companies, defense contractors, the entire health care industry, Wal-Mart and other retailers that cater to people who depend on federal benefits to help pay their grocery bills. Every large consulting firm, every large tech firm (from Microsoft to IBM) has a large unit that provides services and products to the federal government.

Should the U.S. bump up against the debt limit without resolution, it's possible the Pentagon would delay indefinitely the signing of new contracts for fighter jets. Or agencies would cancel or slowdown payment on IT projects. Or Congressmen and their staffers would see their wages reduced. Or fewer people would get food stamps. The cumulative impact would be less demand, less economic activity, more uncertainty. Bad for stocks, good for bonds.

The stocks hurt the most would be those whose business is disproportionately in the U.S., and those whose U.S. business relies disproportionately on direct or indirect government funding.

Yes, the possibility remains that prolonged turmoil in the bond markets could ultimately lead to higher rates. It's possible that the debt limit High Noon could finally bring the bond vigilantes out from hiding. But consider what's happened in the past few years. Amid a huge expansion of the Fed's balance sheet, a sharp rise in government spending, trillion-dollar-plus deficits, and epic levels of political dysfunction, government bonds have rallied -- and rallied again. This five-year chart of the 10-year U.S. government bond perfectly illustrates the point. If all that couldn't rouse the bond vigilantes from their slumber, I'm not sure what will.
James B. Driscoll




Sunday, May 1, 2011

Economic Update: 5/1/11

U.S. Credit Outlook Downgraded: Old News in ONE Day?
Scarce News Coverage Won't Slow the Fast Changes to Come

http://www.elliottwave.com/images/dotted_line.gif

http://www.elliottwave.com/images/transparent_spacer.gif

By James B. Driscoll
Monday, 25th Apr 2011 14:45:00 ET

http://www.elliottwave.com/images/transparent_spacer.gif

"...we now believe that [U.S. economic strength] might not fully offset the credit risks over the next two years at the ‘AAA’ level.” ~ Standard & Poor's (4/18)

You probably heard that Standard & Poor's downgraded the U.S. credit outlook. The financial press duly reported the April 18 announcement. The downgrade means S&P sees a one-in-three chance that the U.S. credit rating will fall below AAA within the next two years. That sounds like big news. But, just one day after the downgrade, the absence of stories on the subject was conspicuous.

At midday on April 19, the front page of a popular financial website didn't include the credit outlook downgrade among its top 7 stories. Another well-known financial website listed the downgrade story in fourth place on the side of the front page, but absent from the center row story list.

Earlier that next day I did see a financial website article about the downgrade, but the title had a quote saying that earnings trumped the downgrade announcement.

Is the national financial psyche numb to the nation's debt crisis?

Many astute historians and economists have for years warned of the dangers of America's debt and deficit. And politicians have kicked the can down the road the whole time.

But now, a major credit rating agency just downgraded the credit outlook for the United States of America.

And the silence is deafening.

EWI's Robert Prechter knows what it means when people choose not to "lend an ear." He's long warned about the nation's credit build-up, and of a day of reckoning:

"In the United States, default could happen to municipal bonds at any time after times get difficult. Politicians in many jurisdictions have borrowed and spent way more money than is likely ever to be paid back. Merely paying the interest on that debt in tough economic times will become an acute problem for many issuers. In such cases, default for many cities and counties will be inevitable. Even the debt of some higher-level government agencies is at serious risk of default in a worst-case scenario."

Time alone will tell if America's credit outlook downgrade will turn into an actual credit rating downgrade.